Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Science

Demand for ‘recognition and reward’ across Europe

Dutch universities have signed a European agreement designed to reform how scientific research is assessed and rewarded. They are among the first signatories.

(Photo: Justyna Botor)

According to a press release, the Netherlands’ university hospitals, the Dutch Research Council and the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences have also officially ratified the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment.

The agreement is the provisional outcome of a concerted European effort to develop a new perspective on research. The Dutch campaign to come up with a new method of ‘recognition and reward’ is in line with that approach.

The agreement’s objectives include generating greater recognition for work beyond the role of researcher, such as teaching, sharing data, providing leadership and ensuring that society can benefit from the research.

Qualitative
Another aim is to emphasise a predominantly qualitative approach to assessing research in which hard data is relegated to a supporting role. In other words, the focus ought not to be how many publications in respectable journals a researcher has to their credit but what their research actually comprises.

This will sound familiar to Dutch researchers, as will the comment that this new approach should have an influence on the recruitment and career development of researchers and other academic staff. The underlying idea is that there are all kinds of important things you could be good at, and these should also play a key role in building an academic career.

The agreement states that the way research proposals are selected for funding also needs to change. Not only should there be rewards for safeguarding scientific integrity, but equal opportunities and diversity should also play a role in how research groups are assessed.

350 organisations
The document is the result of consultations with more than 350 organisations in 40 countries, says the European University Association, EUA. The aim of those behind the agreement is to form a ‘coalition of willing organisations’ to share their experiences and collaborate on steering this change of direction.

It is not yet known which foreign universities and bodies will sign the agreement. The names have not yet been published online.

The agreement is similar to a declaration from ten years ago: the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment, DORA for short. It was signed by universities and bodies worldwide, including the Netherlands. On its website, the organisation behind DORA has welcomed the European initiative.

In the Netherlands, the campaign to introduce reforms like this began in 2013 with the action group Science in Transition, which described the scientific system as “corrupted”. The term ‘recognition and reward’ has been in common use since 2019. Both university administrators and the government have embraced the aspiration to reform.

Criticism has also been expressed in some quarters. Critics argue that there is a lack of clarity about what will replace the existing criteria. Even proponents admit that there is still a lot of detail to be filled in.

HOP, Bas Belleman
Translation: Taalcentrum-VU

HOP Hoger Onderwijs Persbureau

Do you have a question or comment about this article?

redactie@hogeronderwijspersbureau.nl

Comments are closed.